http://www.royalrife.com/0999.html
THE NUTRI-SPEC LETTER
Volume 10 Number 9
From:
Guy R. Schenker, D.C.
September, 1999
Dear Doctor,
In last month's Letter, you read two case studies of
women who each had rather extreme physical and
(especially) emotional symptoms. What these women had in
common was ...
A COMPLETE LOSS OF GLYCEMIC CONTROL ...
associated with a glucogenic metabolic imbalance.
One interesting point about both these women was that
they were both extremely health conscious. Each was
rigorously following the diet which is promoted as the
healthy ideal by the so-called nutrition authorities of
our day. Each patient was, in fact, literally destroying
herself with a diet consisting of high carbohydrate and
"natural" sugar, while avoiding saturated fat and
cholesterol.
You will see this theater of the absurd performed
among your own patients time and time again. Your
glucogenic and parasympathetic patients will be punishing
themselves with a high carb, low fat diet. These are your
patients who are invariably hypoglycemic and who are
(genetically) designed to eat a predominantly fat diet,
and who have little tolerance for carbohydrate, and
virtually no tolerance for sugar. There are literally
millions of these neurotic hypoglycemics out there
dutifully feeding their physical and emotional stability
with the diet recommended by the authorities.
The high carb diet, of course, further feeds their
craving for carbs. With such a passionate craving for
starches, they easily convince themselves that these must
be the foods their bodies need.
- 2 -
As the months and then years go by, they are quite
happy with their diet and quite pleased with themselves
for so successfully avoiding the evil high fat foods.
Meanwhile the depression and anxiety grow ever further out
of control; obesity becomes a further source of both
physical and emotional trauma; allergies, arthritis,
fatigue, and endless other symptoms also enter the
clinical picture.
All that these pathetic people really need to
completely turn themselves around is for you to shine the
light of objectivity into their lives. With your
NUTRI-SPEC testing system you can identify their true
fundamental metabolic needs within minutes. A total
reversal of their dietary habits -- switching to the high
fat diet they so desperately need -- will immediately lift
the dreary cloud of suffering that has darkened their
days.
The next act of this drama is just as absurd.
Starring your ketogenic and sympathetic patients, it
features the severe suffering of those wolfing down 16
ounce steaks in total ignorance of their metabolic needs.
Again, the only way to put a stop to this tragedy is with
your NUTRI-SPEC system leading these patients out of the
darkness.
Let us now follow up on last month's hypoglycemic
theme with two more case studies. We looked at two
glucogenic hypoglycemics -- consider now this para-
sympathetic hypoglycemic.
Case Study #1:
Debbie is a red haired, freckly, blue eyed 37 year
old woman who might as well have walked into our office
wearing a sign, "I am a classic parasympathetic -- please
save me." Here are the highlights of her clinical
picture:
- severe allergies, for which she takes Claritin daily,
and for which she receives allergy shots monthly.
- severe anxiety which was exacerbated by Zoloft, and for
which she now takes Lorazepam as needed.
- insomnia associated with the anxiety -- she wakes up in
the middle of the night in a panic attack.
- chronic fatigue, which is made worse by her difficulty
sleeping.
- 3 -
- constant indigestion which also causes chest pain and
thoracic pain.
- her gall bladder was removed one year ago.
- Prilosec has been prescribed for her indigestion, but
has been of no help.
How do we sort through such a complex clinical
picture? Do we look for a nutritional approach to the
anxiety? Do we give her additional supplements to correct
the chronic fatigue? Do we prescribe natural remedies for
her digestive problems? Can we find the right combination
of antioxidants to cure her allergies? No. No. No. No.
We use an analytical system of clinical nutrition -- we
let our QRG protocol sort through her 46 objective tests
to determine just what she needs to increase her
adaptative capacity by balancing her metabolism.
Debbie's initial testing showed two imbalances --
parasympathetic, along with a potassium excess acidosis.
These two imbalances are very often found concurrently.
Both the parasympathetic and potassium excess acidosis
patterns are associated with weak adrenal function. In
particular, here we are looking at deficient epinepherine
and DHEA output. Both these imbalances are exacerbated by
excess potassium intake. Both imbalances are totally
devastated by juices and fruits, which are a concentrated
source of potassium plus sugar plus acids.
Guess what kind of diet this patient was following?
Her mother had died at an early age of cardiovascular
disease. So, Debbie was on a low fat, low cholesterol
diet, and was eating freely of complex carbs and fruit --
the foods everyone "knows" are good for all of us, and
which are particularly essential to avoid cardiovascular
disease.
What was the cause of this patient's allergies?
Parasympathetic imbalance is associated with excess nasal
and pharengial and bronchial secretion, as well as with
excess histamine activity.
What was the source of the patient's anxiety and
fatigue? Parasympathetic imbalance is associated with
excess insulin and insufficient catecholamine activity,
thus resulting in a strong hypoglycemic tendency. Her
anxiety, fatigue and nocturnal panic attacks are classic
hypoglycemic symptoms.
What about her indigestion? Here was a genetically
- 4 -
predisposed parasympathetic who desperately needed a high
fat intake. What had she been feeding her gall bladder?
Almost nothing but starches and sugars. As a result her
bile flow through her gall bladder was depressed -- the
gall bladder became congested, thus packing full of
stones.
What do we do for Debbie? We put her on the exact
supplement regimen indicated by your QRG analysis --
including Oxy B, Complex P, Tyrosine, Phenylalanine,
Glutamine, and sodium glycerophosphate. She was given the
NUTRI-SPEC Fundamental Diet, the Parasympathetic Diet, the
Potassium Excess Acidosis Diet, and the Prostaglandin
Diet. What happened?
Debbie should have been back within 7 days for her
first follow-up, but was delayed until day 10. What did
we find? Her objective test patterns had improved
considerably. In fact, her parasympathetic imbalance was
no longer testing as positive at all. Because she was
following the relatively high fat, low carbohydrate
dietary recommendations, she was already in ketosis.
While weight loss was not mentioned as one of her goals
for pursuing NUTRI-SPEC, it was apparent that she had
plenty of adipose that she would rather live without. Now
after 10 days on her NUTRI-SPEC regimen she was burning up
her excess fat stores.
Her next test was 14 days later (24 days after her
initial test), at which point she was feeling incredibly
better and was totally drug free. She had had no allergy
medication, no medication for indigestion, and no anxiety
medication. She was premenstrual at that time and was
definitely feeling the effects. She noted that all her
symptoms tended to be worse when she was premenstrual.
(This is typical of parasympathetic patients since
estrogen potentiates parasympathetic activity.) But,
despite being premenstrual, she somehow was enough in
control that she didn't feel the need for her drugs. On
that date the patient showed absolutely no metabolic
imbalances. We substantially decreased all her
supplementation.
In the ensuing month, Debbie has continued to do
well. She does take both allergy medication and anxiety
medication from time to time. But most importantly, she
notices a direct correlation between her carbohydrate
intake and her various symptoms. In other words, she has
seen the direct cause and effect relationship between her
lifestyle choices and her health.
- 5 -
Case Study #2:
Bonnie is an interesting case in glycemic control.
She tested as a glucogenic hypoglycemic, but in treating
her we witnessed some startling changes -- some good, and
some apparently less than ideal.
Bonnie had three major complaints. The first was
menopausal hot flashes. She had stopped menstruating
about a year and a half ago and the hot flashes had
started at that time. Another major compliant was a loss
of bladder control, and this was tied in with her hot
flashes. She reported that whenever she got a hot flash
she must go to the bathroom to urinate immediately.
Finally, Bonnie had a problem with acid reflux which was
associated with pain under her right ribs, and which had
been attributed to a gall bladder problem.
One other noteworthy point from Bonnie's history was
that she had known that she was hypoglycemic since she was
a teenager. As a teen her blood sugar was seen to drop as
low as 35 overnight. She was now 52 and no longer
considered hypoglycemia a major complaint since she had
learned very early in the game that she needed to eat a
fair amount of meat to control her sugar.
Upon initial testing Bonnie showed three imbalances:
dysaerobic, glucogenic and metabolic acidosis. She was
given the indicated supplementation which included Oxy B,
Oxy D, Oxy D+, Oxy G, Formula EW, Sodium Glycerophosphate,
di-sodium phosphate, sodium citrate and glutamine. She
was also put on the Dysaerobic, Glucogenic, and Metabolic
Acidosis Diets with a strong emphasis on totally avoiding
fruit, sugar and all sources of polyunsaturated oils. The
foods she needed to emphasize in her diet were meat, fish,
poultry, eggs and butter.
On her first follow-up test in 7 days, Bonnie showed
spectacular improvement. Not one NUTRI-SPEC metabolic
imbalance was evident. There was so much improvement that
everyone of her supplements (except Oxy B, of course,) was
reduced substantially in quantity as per the QRG analysis.
Accompanying the amazing improvement in her objective test
patterns was Bonnie's report that her hot flashes had
decreased to the point where they were nothing but a very
mild nuisance. At the same time in the past week she had
had more energy than she could remember having in years.
We scheduled Bonnie for her next follow-up in 3 weeks.
One week later, however, Bonnie phoned our office to
say that her hot flashes had come surging back. We
- 6 -
advised her to increase a few of her supplements back up
to the original dosage.
When she did report for her next appointment, her
tests showed that her dysaerobic and metabolic acidosis
patterns were still no longer evident, but her glucogenic
test pattern had returned. We adjusted her supplements as
per the QRG, and scheduled an appointment in 4 weeks.
Now is when things got interesting. Bonnie phoned
our office 2 days later with the report that her blood
sugar had actually gone high. You see, Bonnie's husband
is diabetic and so she has access to a home blood sugar
test. On that day she had felt unusually poorly and just
out of curiosity had checked her blood sugar and it was
running up near 140. Now, this is not an extremely high
blood sugar -- certainly not in a diabetic range -- but,
it is higher than normal, and certainly higher than you
would expect in someone who is a glucogenic hypoglycemic.
We were concerned that the Oxygenic G had pushed her
blood sugar up. So, we told her to decrease it to just 1
daily as a precautionary measure, and to report to us if
there were any continuing problems.
When we saw Bonnie 4 weeks later the source of the
problem was apparent in her objective tests. Our concern
that treating her as glucogenic had been over-done was
unfounded. She still showed a glucogenic test pattern.
The problem was that we had never completely taken her off
the small maintenance dosage of Oxy D and Oxy D+. Now her
test pattern showed a very strong anaerobic pattern. We
stopped the Oxy D and D+ completely and boosted the Oxy G
back up to the dose indicated by the QRG analysis.
Now, Bonnie is a very satisfied lady. Her hot
flashes are only a fraction of the frequency and severity
that they originally were. Her bladder and digestive
function have improved, and she is over all feeling quite
well. In addition, she lost 20 pounds in her first 8
weeks of NUTRI-SPEC, "without even trying."
Lessons to be learned from these case studies? You
are only going to "cure" a patient's symptoms by
correcting the cause(s) of those symptoms. You are only
going to find the causative factors by looking at
fundamental metabolic control systems. You can only
effectively evaluate control systems with a systematic,
objective analysis. Your NUTRI-SPEC analysis is so
complete, yet so concise, you can determine precisely each
patient's metabolic needs in just a few minutes.
Next
Nutri-Spec Letters
Index