http://www.royalrife.com/0899.html
THE NUTRI-SPEC LETTER
Volume 10 Number 8
From:
Guy R. Schenker, D.C.
August, 1999
Dear Doctor,
You enjoy reading case histories which illustrate the
amazing power of metabolic balancing with NUTRI-SPEC. The
case histories presented in this Letter are both
informational and motivational. Seeing what power is
easily at your disposal with NUTRI-SPEC gives you the
motivation to get into your office and really help some
people in a way you haven't helped them before, and in a
way that no one else can.
A case history also concretizes the abstract
principles of NUTRI-SPEC. The philosophical premise that
metabolic balancing is the only long-term effective way to
increase your patients' adapatative capacity is brought to
life in very real terms when you can envision the
application of NUTRI-SPEC to a person that resembles in
every detail dozens of patients in your own practice.
Case Study #1:
Amy came to us as a 46 year old school teacher with major
complaints which included:
- elevated cholesterol and triglycerides (for which she
was taking Lipitor)
- weight gain
- depression (for which she took Prozac fairly regularly)
- fatigue, lethargy, and muscle weakness
- poor memory and inability to focus
- night sweats
The patient's primary motivation for seeking NUTRI-
SPEC was to lower the cholesterol and triglycerides and
- 2 -
lose weight. The impetus here was the fact that her
father had died at an early age of cardiovascular disease
associated with extreme atherosclerosis.
This patient had been on Lipitor for several years
with minimal improvement in her cholesterol and
triglyceride levels. She diligently followed the low fat,
high complex carbohydrate diet recommended by the
physician who had prescribed the Lipitor. After several
years of monitoring her blood fats every couple of months
and seeing them hardly budge, she was intelligent enough
to realize there was something fundamentally wrong with
her medical treatment regimen. She had been referred by a
relative (who had tested parasympathetic) who had been put
on a relatively high fat, low carbohydrate diet, and had
experienced a dramatic turn-around in physical and
emotional symptoms. Amy was thus in our office with an
open mind, prepared to have her basic premises regarding
health and diet turned completely upside down.
We didn't disappoint her.
Her initial NUTRI-SPEC testing revealed electrolyte
stress and anaerobic imbalances. We explained to Amy that
the metabolic imbalances we found through our objective
testing system revealed that she had already taken several
giant steps down the same road her father had traveled.
We also assured her that it was not too late to completely
reverse course and not only prevent the further advance of
cardiovascular disease but to restore excellent
cardiovascular health. To do so, however, would require
that she completely abandon the ultra low fat diet she had
been following. We explained how her metabolic imbalances
were the cause of her early stages of cardiovascular
disease and certainly the cause of her weight gain, not to
mention her many other symptoms. We also explained that
these metabolic imbalances were not only not helped by a
low fat, high carbohydrate diet, but were actually
exacerbated by that diet.
Amy listened eagerly as we explained what she would
have to do. We chose for her the supplements indicated by
the Quick Reference Guide for her two metabolic
imbalances. We gave her the NUTRI-SPEC Fundamental Diet
along with the specific dietary recommendations for her
electrolyte stress and anaerobic imbalances (including
smothering everything she ate with olive oil). We
modified the NUTRI-SPEC Fundamental Diet just slightly,
since weight loss was one of her primary goals. Instead
of giving her the protein to carbs ratio of 4:40 we
changed the ratio to 4:32, giving her a little less carbs.
- 3 -
Then, we went one step further in altering the
NUTRI-SPEC Fundamental Diet. Since she clearly understood
and was receptive to the idea of switching from high carb
low fat to the exact opposite, we explained to her that
she could jump-start the weight loss aspect of her
NUTRI-SPEC regimen if she would go on a 10 day period of
even more carbohydrate restriction -- with a 4:8 ratio or
less. We suggested that she pick a 10 day period when she
knew she would not be encumbered by social events that
would make it very difficult to abstain from carbohydrate.
Amy responded to NUTRI-SPEC in typical fashion. On
her first follow-up test the next week her electrolyte
stress pattern was somewhat improved and her anaerobic
test pattern was no longer evident. We thus already began
reducing her supplementation.
Also on this first follow-up it was noted that she
was already in ketosis from nothing more than the NUTRI-
SPEC Fundamental Diet. In other words, she was already
burning her excess reserves of body fat. She had not yet
done her 10 days of more rigorous carbohydrate
restriction, but she planned to at her first opportunity.
A couple of weeks later Amy did begin her 10 days of
carbohydrate restricted NUTRI-SPEC Fundamental Diet and a
very interesting thing happened. She felt so good both
physically and emotionally that she decided to just stick
with it. And that is exactly what she did. Instead of
going on very low carbohydrate for 10 days she stayed on
it pretty much continuously with only an occasional meal
when, for social reasons, she violated it slightly -- then
got right back on it immediately thereafter. As the weeks
passed, Amy maintained a state of moderate ketosis and
continued to feel well and lose weight.
Now, pay close attention to what happened after 7
weeks on NUTRI-SPEC. Her tests at that stage revealed
absolutely no electrolyte stress and no anaerobic
imbalance, but, a glucogenic imbalance was now evident.
This is not at all uncommon, even among your patients
who are progressing very nicely. The glucogenic tendency
existed in this patient all along and it probably had been
her metabolic tendency since childhood. The glucogenic
test pattern was masked by the electrolyte stress and
anaerobic imbalances which needed to be corrected first to
expose the underlying glucogenic problem. At this point
we were able to drastically reduce and/or eliminate all
- 4 -
her ES and anaerobic supplements, and add Oxygenic G plus
the glucogenic dietary recommendations.
That her glucogenic tendency was extreme was
evidenced by the fact that she had already been following
what amounted to a perfect glucogenic dietary regimen. In
other words, this was a person who was ideally suited to a
high saturated fat diet and had absolutely no tolerance
for carbohydrate. The patient was sharp enough to agree
that this must be the case, since she felt so good on the
low carbohydrate diet and had felt absolutely miserable
during the years that she followed the low fat diet.
Amy had skipped her first bi-monthly blood test after
having started NUTRI-SPEC. She wanted to give it a chance
to see what it could do for her. So, it was nearly 4
months after beginning NUTRI-SPEC that she nervously went
for a cholesterol and triglyceride check. By now she had
confided in her M.D. that she had totally abandoned his
plan and was sucking down eggs and fatty meat to her
heart's content, and almost totally abstaining from sugar
and most other carbohydrates. Anxiously she faced her
M.D. for his report of findings.
She was deliriously happy to find that her
cholesterol levels, while still somewhat elevated at 227,
were down significantly, while her HDL (the "good"
cholesterol) was the highest it had ever been. Her
triglycerides (which is a far more important parameter
than cholesterol as a predictor of cardiovascular disease)
had plummeted all the way from a high of 289 to a
perfectly normal 88. Amy was ecstatic.
How many people just like Amy do you know? In other
words, how many people do you know for whom you could
prevent inevitable cardiovascular disease, while at the
same time powerfully impacting their physical and
emotional well-being?
Case Study #2:
Jenny is another interesting case to illustrate just what
you can do with your NUTRI-SPEC system. She came to our
office having been diagnosed with a "chemical imbalance of
the brain" which caused severe depression and anxiety.
This was not just your run-of-the-mill depressed 40 year
old woman. Jenny's problems had persisted for more than
10 years, during which time she had been hospitalized on
several occasions. She had worked herself off the drug
Lithium, but was still taking large doses of both Prozac
and Xanax daily.
- 5 -
Jenny's other major complaints were seasonal
allergies for which she used an inhaler, and PMS. She
also explained that all of her emotional symptoms were
much worse during her premenstrual time. Typically her
emotions tended toward anger when she was premenstrual.
In addition to her medications, the patient was
taking truckloads of nutrition supplements daily, and was
using a progesterone cream which she said had helped with
premenstrual breast tenderness.
Jenny's first NUTRI-SPEC testing revealed one
imbalance -- a potassium excess acidosis. She was,
however, still under the influence of the medications and
some of the nutrition supplements, so we considered it
likely that she had other imbalances as well. She was put
on the supplement regimen for potassium excess acidosis
along with the NUTRI-SPEC Fundamental Diet.
We gave particular emphasis to avoiding fruit, soda,
and juice. Fruit was something that this patient was
eating in fairly large quantities, thinking it was
healthy. Also, because of the obvious estrogenic
component to this patient's problems, we emphasized the no
oil aspect of the NUTRI-SPEC Fundamental diet.
On the first follow-up which was 5 days later, we got
a much more clear picture of what Jenny needed. Now,
without so much drug influence and non-specific
supplementation clouding the picture, we found an
electrolyte insufficiency and a glucogenic imbalance. The
Quick Reference Guide gave us just the supplements and
dietary recommendations Jenny needed. (As it turned out,
most of the electrolytes she needed for the EI imbalance
were the same ones we had given her 5 days previously for
the potassium excess acidosis pattern).
We explained to the patient that she had an acid
hypoglycemia. We emphasized again the importance of
avoiding sugar, particularly the acid sugars such as found
in fruit and juice and soda.
When we next saw the patient 3 weeks later, her test
patterns were looking much better. She had just begun in
the few days before that visit to experience diarrhea
after taking her electrolytes. As you might expect, her
QRG analysis showed that she no longer had the need for
most of those electrolytes.
- 6 -
What are our thoughts on this patient? We must keep
foremost in our mind that the patient's stated goal in
starting NUTRI-SPEC was finding a way to get off her
Prozac and Xanax. We suspect that that is a possibility,
but it is something that must be done very slowly. After
8 weeks on NUTRI-SPEC her PMS has already improved
significantly, which is a good sign that on her next visit
(in 4 weeks) we should be able to begin the drug
withdrawal. When we do, it will be very slowly and
cautiously. (Remember, this patient has been hospitalized
with emotional crises on several occasions.) Since she
takes Prozac and Xanax both twice daily we will begin by
deleting one dose of Prozac on Monday and one dose of
Xanax on Friday as a starting point. How quickly we can
progress from that point is completely determined by her
objective test results.
Our other thought on this patient is that there may
be a parasympathetic component to her electrolyte
insufficiency imbalance which is being hidden by her use
of the inhaler. We are keeping a sharp eye out for a
parasympathetic tendency and if that pattern ever emerges
(even if partly hidden by the inhaler) we will pounce upon
it with Complex P and whatever else may be indicated.
What did you find noteworthy in reviewing these case
studies? You may have noted that:
- both patients had mental/emotional symptoms which
responded very quickly to balancing with NUTRI-SPEC.
- each had sugar overload as a causative factor in her
metabolic imbalances, and each had poor glycemic control
as a result of her imbalances.
- each patient was literally destroying herself with a
diet consisting of high carbohydrate and "natural" sugar,
plus avoidance of saturated fat.
- both patients were glucogenic and had many similarities
in their treatment regimen, yet their symptoms and
physical appearance couldn't have been more different --
overweight vs. lean, lethargic depression vs. manic
depression.
- each patient presented the same clinical picture as many
of your patients -- patients whom you can and must help
with NUTRI-SPEC.
Sincerely,
Guy R. Schenker, D.C.
Next
Nutri-Spec Letters
Index