http://www.royalrife.com/0300.html
THE NUTRI-SPEC LETTER
Volume 11 Number 3
From:
Guy R. Schenker, D.C.
March, 2000
Dear Doctor,
With NUTRI-SPEC you have the power to protect your patients (and
yourself and your family, of course) from ...
"THE DEADLY QUARTET."
This is the name given by physiologists to the metabolic syndrome
which includes:
- obesity
- elevated triglycerides
- elevated blood pressure
- diabetes
The name derives from the fact that if you have these four
conditions simultaneously you don't have much life to look
forward to. Essentially, your two choices are to die much,
much sooner than you would like, or, to suffer morbid symptoms
for a long period of time and then die.
You know from your study of NUTRI-SPEC that half of all
Americans die of cardiovascular disease. If you can do so
without too much self- torment, ponder the dreary facts of
death -- half of your patients, half of your friends, and half
of your family are going to die of heart attacks and strokes.
But -- if any of those patients, or friends, or family members
have been hanging out with the deadly quartet, their chances
of succumbing to cardiovascular disease are many, many times
those of someone their age who has successfully avoided such
company.
On a cheerier note -- you can, with NUTRI-SPEC, push all four
of those nasty rascals right out of anyone's life. How? Ask
yourself what fundamental metabolic imbalance would be
associated with this deadly quartet? Electrolyte Stress you
say? You are correct in that everyone suffering from this
metabolic syndrome would, upon NUTRI-SPEC testing show an
electrolyte stress imbalance. However, the electrolyte stress
is secondary in this case to a more primary fundamental
metabolic imbalance -- one that preceded it probably by several
years at least. Which NUTRI-SPEC imbalance would that be?
Let me give you a clue. My thought is that this metabolic
syndrome should be re-named the "Deadly Quintet." You see,
there is a fifth shady character who is always lurking behind
the scenes. And though he gets not as much recognition, he
is actually the one that started the gang and put the other
four up to their dastardly deeds. Who is this devil?
INSULIN RESISTANCE.
Insulin resistance is the condition in which a person loses
sensitivity to the hormone insulin. Typically these people
put out normal or even exaggerated quantities of insulin in
reaction to dietary carbohydrate. But, the insulin in these
insensitive people does not do its job. Instead of the insulin
picking up the glucose in the blood and carrying it to the
cells, the cells are refractory to the hormone's action. Thus
the insulin levels in the blood remain high for many hours
after a meal, all the while it takes much longer than it
should for sugar to clear from the blood.
Have you figured out which NUTRI-SPEC imbalance we are dealing
with here? We are talking about insufficient capacity to clear
sugar from the blood and put it to metabolic use. We are
talking about a metabolic imbalance that eventually leads
to diabetes. Yes -- you've got it - we are talking about
a ketogenic metabolic imbalance. Every one of your patients
who shows a ketogenic tendency is a prime candidate for adult
onset diabetes, plus, elevated blood pressure, elevated
triglycerides and cardiovascular disease. Every one of
these patients -- under your care -- can be spared what
inevitably would have been a gruesome future.
If insulin resistance is the king pin of the deadly quintet,
what created this monster in the first place? Physiologists
determined decades ago that insulin resistance was associated
with high blood pressure, obesity, diabetes and elevated
triglycerides. However, it took years to sort out the cause
and effect relationships.
Since obesity (and abdominal obesity in particular) was always
a factor -- many physiologists concluded that obesity was a
cause of this metabolic syndrome. This belief was reinforced
by the fact that when obese patients with this metabolic
syndrome lost weight the triglycerides, blood pressure, and
blood sugar all improved as well. Other physiologists
discovered that the insulin resistance component of this
metabolic syndrome occurred to some degree in almost everyone
with age. They attempted to claim, therefore, that aging was
a cause of insulin resistance and thus the rest of the
quintet, and that some people simply showed this aspect of
aging sooner than others.
Somewhere very early along this research path it had been
discovered that the deadly quintet could be created in lab
animals (and in people) with a diet that was high in fat and
high in sugar. Countless experiments were done feeding
animals and humans a high fat plus high sugar diet and observing
the horrible consequences. Still, the actual sequence of cause
and effect was not determined. Did you have to be already
obese before a high fat plus high sugar diet would cause
insulin resistance? Did you have to reach a certain
physiological age before high fat plus high sugar would do
its damage? Did you have to become diabetic first before the
triglycerides and blood pressure would go up? Did the
diabetic condition make you sensitive to a high fat and high
sugar diet, or did the high fat plus high sugar diet cause
the diabetes?
Fortunately, a few physiologists think analytically. A series
of experiments was designed that demonstrated the exact
sequence of events, and, exactly what causes what. Here is the
sequence:
Step One
- High Fat + High Sugar Diet.
Step Two
- Insulin Resistance
- Decreased Glucose Transport
- Elevated Serum Insulin
Step Three
- Elevated Serum Triglycerides
- Increased Size of Abdominal Fat Cells
Step Four
- Elevated Blood Pressure
- Increased Clotting Tendency of Blood
- (Serum Cholesterol Normal to Somewhat Elevated (but never
nearly as elevated as Triglycerides))
Step Five
- Obesity
Step Six
- Type II Diabetes Mellitus
In other words, it is diet that pushes over the first domino
that leads to crashing health. This is important. It shows
that anyone who tries to intervene therapeutically in this
metabolic syndrome is going to have very limited success
unless they address the primary issue -- the garbage this
person has been cramming in their mouth for years and years
and years.
The cardiovascular disease from which this person will
ultimately expire is not caused by obesity per se; it is
not primarily caused by diabetes; it is not caused by aging;
and it is not caused primarily by elevated triglycerides.
It is the insulin resistance that always happens first;
none of the rest can happen unless preceded by insulin
resistance. Furthermore, insulin resistance has one and only
one cause ...
THE HIGH FAT PLUS HIGH SUGAR DIET.
Predictably, this important information is slow to have an
impact on the medical establishment. Patients with high
triglycerides are treated with medications to pull the blood
fats down. People with high blood pressure are treated with
an assortment of anti-hypertensive drugs; people who are
obese are given a low calorie diet; and people with diabetes
are given drugs to control their sugar (and often are given
insulin (horrors!) when their insulin levels are already sky
high). (Insulin is itself a very damaging hormone by mechanisms
other than those at work in the insulin resistance syndrome.)
Not nearly enough emphasis is put on the fact that a rotten
diet is the ultimate cause, and that correcting the diet has
to be part of the cure.
If you happened to have your brain plugged in as you read these
last few pages, there is an obvious question that popped into
your mind. A question that is so obvious that you must be
wondering (as I did for years) why so few physiologists had
enough analytical thinking capacity to ask the same question.
If a high fat plus high sugar diet sets off this whole chain
reaction of insulin resistance with all its ramifications,
exactly what is it about this diet that causes problems?
Is it the fat? Is it the sugar? Or is it that the fat and
sugar have to be combined?
As it turns out, these questions and more have been answered
conclusively. And while these important issues have been
resolved in the scientific literature, the medical establishment
has reacted to the truth with a yawn. After all, why bother
to get excited about the truth, why bother to get excited
about cause and effect, why bother to get excited about
prevention, when one has Calan, Lipitor, and Rezulin, and an
amazing arsenal of (not so wondrous) wonder drugs to play with?
Since we NUTRI-SPEC Doctors think a little differently, we are
thrilled to discover the truth and find ways to use that
knowledge to help our patients. Some excellent studies have
been done which really zero in on the dietary culprit in this
metabolic syndrome. Care to guess what it is? Is it the fat?
Is it the sugar? Is it the combination of the two? One of
the best studies I have seen looked at every conceivable
combination of dietary factors, plus exercise, to see just what
did and did not cause insulin resistance. The study looked at
a high fat plus high sugar diet, and a high fat plus low sugar
diet, and a low fat plus high sugar diet, and a low fat plus
low sugar diet, plus each of those diets with or without
supplemental dietary fiber, plus each of those diets with and
without exercise.
The bottom line was that ...
SUGAR, AND SUGAR ALONE
IS THE CAUSE OF INSULIN REISITANCE.
Furthermore, the effect of sugar is so powerful that no amount
of exercise and no amount of dietary fiber reduces its damage
in the least. No amount of fat restriction reduces its damage
either. Furthermore, no quantity of fat intake would cause
insulin resistance, unless that high fat diet was accompanied
by high sugar intake.
So now our case appears to be complete. We began discussing
the deadly quartet and resolved to re-name it the deadly
quintet because insulin resistance was the key. We then
carried our analysis a step further to find that insulin
resistance had one and only one cause and that was an improper
diet. Now we see that the qualities which constitute an
improper diet can be reduced to one single factor -- the
intake of sugar.
Is our case complete? Not quite. We have two more giant steps
to take. First, we must ask ourselves just what is meant by
"sugar?" The sugar used in all of these studies to create this
vicious metabolic syndrome was sucrose. What do we know about
sucrose? We know that it is a di-saccharide comprised of
glucose plus fructose. We at NUTRI-SPEC also know (review
Chapter 10 of your Manual) that glucose is capable of causing
only a fraction of the metabolic damage (glycation, hypoglycemia,
hormone imbalances, etc.) that fructose causes. What this means
is that the real villain revealed by our detective work is none
other than the single molecule -- fructose -- fruit sugar.
(Go back to page 3 and change Step One to read, "High Sucrose
(Fructose) Diet.")
Now that we have solved the mystery of the cause and cure of
ne of the most virulent pathologies to afflict human kind,
we must take the one final giant step and ask what does this
mean clinically? As we have already stated, this entire
metabolic syndrome is a perfect description of what is going
in your NUTRI-SPEC patients who test as ketogenic. It is
your ketogenic patients who tend to react to the common high
fructose diet with the clinical picture we have been discussing.
Contrast this to your glucogenic types who eat equally high
quantities of the devastating sugar fructose, yet who respond
in an entirely different fashion. Your ketogenic patients
will show elevated blood sugar while your glucogenic patients
are reactive hypoglycemics. Your ketogenic patients will
have high triglycerides far in excess of any tendency to
high cholesterol. Your glucogenic patients will frequently
have cholesterol problems that far exceed their triglyceride
problems. Your ketogenic patients tend to gain weight above
the waist and particularly in their abdomen, while your
glucogenic patients tend to gain weight below the waist as
much or more than above the waist. Your ketogenic patients
have a much higher tendency to develop cardiovascular disease
than your glucogenic patients do.
Another way to say this is that most Americans eat disgusting
and devastating quantities of fructose. On an individual
basis, if one has a ketogenic tendency, one is going to die
from eating fructose; if one has a glucogenic tendency,
one will live a long life during which one feels half dead
from eating fructose. In either case you can, with NUTRI-SPEC,
restore metabolic balance and add tremendously to the quantity
and quality of each individual's life.
Sincerely,
Guy R. Schenker, D.C.
Barnard R.J., Youngren J.F., Martin D.A. Diet, not aging,
causes skeletal muscle insulin resistance. Gerontology.
1995;42,205-11.
Barnard RJ, Roberts CK, Varon SM, Berger JJ. Diet induced
insulin resistance precedes other aspects of the metabolic
syndrome. J Appl Physiol. 1998 Apr; 84(4)1311-5.
Grimditch GK, Barnard RJ, Hendriks L, Weitzman D. Peripheral
insulin sensitivity as modified by diet and exercise training.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Jul;48(1):38-43.
Next
Nutri-Spec Letters
Index